From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "Yoder Stuart-B08248" <stuart.yoder@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: document new interrupt-array property
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:30:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <efb594e22b9b7e74f593e4a8f90b9e81@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA302A597F5@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net>
> Here is the difference though-- in the interrupt-parent/interrupts
> case you need interrupt-parents to _even parse_ interrupts.
Just like you need the "interrupt-parent" property in
the normal case already.
> The #interrupt-size could be different for each of the interrupts
> parents.
It won't be in most cases though. And it doesn't _really_
matter.
> I understand some properties only make sense together, but only
> can be parsed together seems ugly.
That is true for many important properties already. And
it can't be helped unless you a) make the tree way less
flexible; or b) duplicate information all over the place.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-23 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-21 23:25 [PATCH] powerpc: document new interrupt-array property Stuart Yoder
2007-02-22 0:29 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-22 1:18 ` David Gibson
2007-02-22 7:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-22 10:34 ` David Gibson
2007-02-22 11:06 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-22 15:47 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-22 17:09 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 19:15 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-23 21:30 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 21:57 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-23 22:30 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2007-02-24 6:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-24 6:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-24 11:24 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-26 4:16 ` David Gibson
2007-02-26 5:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-26 13:08 ` David Gibson
2007-02-26 14:26 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-27 2:32 ` David Gibson
2007-02-27 2:52 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-27 3:45 ` David Gibson
2007-02-27 11:49 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-28 0:40 ` David Gibson
2007-02-28 1:00 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-28 6:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-26 16:53 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-22 22:57 ` David Gibson
2007-02-23 0:07 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 0:33 ` David Gibson
2007-02-23 0:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 16:07 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-23 16:14 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-23 17:00 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 16:55 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-23 17:01 ` Yoder Stuart-B08248
2007-02-23 17:51 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-22 22:48 ` David Gibson
2007-02-23 0:25 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-24 6:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-24 11:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-22 7:19 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-02-24 6:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-02-24 11:11 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=efb594e22b9b7e74f593e4a8f90b9e81@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=stuart.yoder@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).