From: Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powernv: Avoid calling trace tlbie in kexec path.
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:48:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f069c870-2bdb-89a1-16d7-9eb0e589107a@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKTCnzkSJo0wKx96=N2fxDVZ8KaM+uT3sUHGNgtdOD=RLajwCg@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/23/2017 04:26 AM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Mahesh J Salgaonkar
> <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> From: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Rebooting into a new kernel with kexec fails in trace_tlbie() which is
>> called from native_hpte_clear(). This happens if the running kernel has
>> CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled. With lockdep enabled, the tracepoints always
>> execute few RCU checks regardless of whether tracing is on or off.
>> We are already in the last phase of kexec sequence in real mode with
>> HILE_BE set. At this point the RCU check ends up in RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN and
>> causes kexec to fail.
>>
>
> Effectively we can't enter the trace point code after we've set
> HILE_BE. Do we need
> a fixes tag? Or is this a side-effect of a new generic change?
Yup. I missed it. Will resend the patch with fixes tag
Fixes: 0428491cba92 ("powerpc/mm: Trace tlbie(l) instructions")
>
> I think the right thing in the longer run might be to do a TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION
> and have the condition do the right thing, but what you have for now is good.
>
> Balbir Singh.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-23 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-22 17:32 [PATCH] powernv: Avoid calling trace tlbie in kexec path Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2017-11-22 19:07 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-11-23 9:38 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2017-11-23 10:02 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-11-22 22:56 ` Balbir Singh
2017-11-23 11:18 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar [this message]
2017-11-23 12:15 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-11-23 13:11 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-11-24 4:13 ` Balbir Singh
2017-11-24 6:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-11-24 6:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-11-24 9:46 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f069c870-2bdb-89a1-16d7-9eb0e589107a@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).