From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from penguin.netx4.com (embeddededge.com [209.113.146.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C41968847 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 05:13:25 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1133275187.2664.32.camel@iho.sysgo.com> References: <1133275187.2664.32.camel@iho.sysgo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Dan Malek Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:13:33 -0500 To: ihornberger@sysgo.com Cc: linuxppc-devel list Subject: Re: immap with 8xx. List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Nov 29, 2005, at 9:39 AM, Ingo Hornberger wrote: > But it seems that there was some generalization work done, which didn't > reach the 8xx part. Particularly this means that some parts of > 'asm/commproc.h' as well as (at least) 'asm/immap_8260.h' built up a > new > header 'asm/immap_cpm2.h'. That's because the cpm2 is used in more parts than just the 82xx, so we carved up the files to make it more useful. > Actally I miss a file like 'asm/immap_cpm1.h'. The 8xx is the only processor to use the CPM1, so just update the immap or 8xx files to accommodate the differences you may need. There isn't a similar requirement to create a immap_cpm1.h file like there was for the CPM2. What kind of updates do you need? Thanks. -- Dan