From: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hotplug-cpu.c: set UNISOLATE on dlpar_cpu_remove() failure
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:13:57 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f4d65cf6-08d1-0bcc-cba2-845099a82aa4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v98icuek.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
On 4/19/21 9:48 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> writes:
>> The RTAS set-indicator call, when attempting to UNISOLATE a DRC that is
>> already UNISOLATED or CONFIGURED, returns RTAS_OK and does nothing else
>> for both QEMU and phyp. This gives us an opportunity to use this
>> behavior to signal the hypervisor layer when an error during device
>> removal happens, allowing it to do a proper error handling, while not
>> breaking QEMU/phyp implementations that don't have this support.
>>
>> This patch introduces this idea by unisolating all CPU DRCs that failed
>> to be removed by dlpar_cpu_remove_by_index(), when handling the
>> PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_INDEX event. This is being done for this event
>> only because its the only CPU removal event QEMU uses, and there's no
>> need at this moment to add this mechanism for phyp only code.
>
> Have you also confirmed that phyp is not bothered by it? ie. everything
> seems to continue working when you trigger this path on phyp.
Yes. Daniel Bueso (dbuesom@us.ibm.com) from the partition firmware team
helped me with that. We confirmed that phyp returns RTAS_OK under these
conditions (Unisolating an unisolated/configured DRC).
Thanks,
DHB
>
> cheers
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
>> index 12cbffd3c2e3..ed66895c2f51 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
>> @@ -802,8 +802,15 @@ int dlpar_cpu(struct pseries_hp_errorlog *hp_elog)
>> case PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ACTION_REMOVE:
>> if (hp_elog->id_type == PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_COUNT)
>> rc = dlpar_cpu_remove_by_count(count);
>> - else if (hp_elog->id_type == PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_INDEX)
>> + else if (hp_elog->id_type == PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_INDEX) {
>> rc = dlpar_cpu_remove_by_index(drc_index);
>> + /* Setting the isolation state of an UNISOLATED/CONFIGURED
>> + * device to UNISOLATE is a no-op, but the hypervison can
>> + * use it as a hint that the cpu removal failed.
>> + */
>> + if (rc)
>> + dlpar_unisolate_drc(drc_index);
>> + }
>> else
>> rc = -EINVAL;
>> break;
>> --
>> 2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-19 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-16 21:02 [PATCH 0/2] pseries: UNISOLATE DRCs to signal device removal error Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-04-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] dlpar.c: introduce dlpar_unisolate_drc() Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-04-19 4:01 ` David Gibson
2021-04-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] hotplug-cpu.c: set UNISOLATE on dlpar_cpu_remove() failure Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-04-19 4:02 ` David Gibson
2021-04-19 12:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-04-19 13:13 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza [this message]
2021-04-20 3:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-04-19 3:59 ` [PATCH 0/2] pseries: UNISOLATE DRCs to signal device removal error David Gibson
2021-04-21 13:08 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f4d65cf6-08d1-0bcc-cba2-845099a82aa4@gmail.com \
--to=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).