linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/ipic: Fix a bounds check in ipic_set_priority()
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 08:18:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f570563c-1cc7-fecf-2ed2-58164047ec9d@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sgzchcw8.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>



Le 05/12/2018 à 04:26, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> Hi Dan,
> 
> Thanks for the patch.
> 
> Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> writes:
>> The ipic_info[] array only has 95 elements so I have made the bounds
>> check smaller to prevent a read overflow.  It was Smatch that found
>> this issue:
>>
>>      arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c:784 ipic_set_priority()
>>      error: buffer overflow 'ipic_info' 95 <= 127
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> I wasn't able to find any callers of this code.  Maybe we removed the
>> last one in commit b9f0f1bb2bca ("[POWERPC] Adapt ipic driver to new
>> host_ops interface, add set_irq_type to set IRQ sense").  So perhaps we
>> should just remove it.  I'm not really comfortable doing that myself,
>> because I don't know the code well enough and can't build test
>> it properly.
> 
> Hah wow, last usage removed in 2006!
> 
> I don't see any mention of it since then, so I'll remove it. If it
> breaks something we can put it back.
> 
> Can smatch help us find things like this that are defined non-static but
> never used?
> 

I think we have to do that carrefully. Some of those functions might be 
used by out-of-tree boards.

I'm thinking especially at ipic_get_mcp_status() and 
ipic_set_mcp_status(). They are used in my 832x boards's machine check 
handler to know when a machine check is a timeout from the 832x watchdog.

Christophe

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-06  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-03 14:48 [PATCH] powerpc/ipic: Fix a bounds check in ipic_set_priority() Dan Carpenter
2018-12-05  3:26 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-05  8:11   ` Julia Lawall
2018-12-05 12:04     ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-05 12:06       ` Julia Lawall
2018-12-06  7:18   ` Christophe LEROY [this message]
2018-12-06  8:12     ` Julia Lawall
2018-12-11 14:26       ` Dan Carpenter
2018-12-07  2:07     ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-10 12:05       ` Christophe Leroy
2018-12-06  9:34   ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f570563c-1cc7-fecf-2ed2-58164047ec9d@c-s.fr \
    --to=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kim.phillips@freescale.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).