From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D61C433B4 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 09:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC6AE6102A for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 09:53:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DC6AE6102A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FGtjy4S3hz3c0p for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 19:53:26 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.191; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com; envelope-from=weiyongjun1@huawei.com; receiver=) Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FGtjc1nP8z2yYn for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 19:53:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FGtfH4M5rzPnWd; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 17:50:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.178.48] (10.174.178.48) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 17:52:56 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] [POWERPC] Rename get_property to of_get_property: use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock From: "weiyongjun (A)" To: Ye Bin , Benjamin Herrenschmidt References: <20210409095148.2294319-1-yebin10@huawei.com> <4b0b16f3-bb06-3a90-5148-ea8302bb3a58@huawei.com> Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 17:52:55 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4b0b16f3-bb06-3a90-5148-ea8302bb3a58@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.178.48] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hulk Robot Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Rename get_property to of_get_property: use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock ^^^^^^^^^ Please fix the module name in the patch subject. > spinlock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_SPINLOCK() > >> rather than explicitly calling spin_lock_init(). >> >> Reported-by: Hulk Robot >> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin >> --- >>   drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-led.c | 4 +--- >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-led.c >> b/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-led.c >> index ae067ab2373d..2502119cff42 100644 >> --- a/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-led.c >> +++ b/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-led.c >> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ >>   #include >>   #include >>   -static spinlock_t pmu_blink_lock; >> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pmu_blink_lock); >>   static struct adb_request pmu_blink_req; >>   /* -1: no change, 0: request off, 1: request on */ >>   static int requested_change; >> @@ -105,8 +105,6 @@ static int __init via_pmu_led_init(void) >>           return -ENODEV; >>       } >>       of_node_put(dt); >> - >> -    spin_lock_init(&pmu_blink_lock); >>       /* no outstanding req */ >>       pmu_blink_req.complete = 1; >>       pmu_blink_req.done = pmu_req_done; >>