linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] powerpc: Fix vDSO clock_getres()
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:01:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8206e04-79d2-87e7-0cf0-04d099b3ad40@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a76f55d-eb0d-fb49-8e59-f0e89e561f7b@c-s.fr>

On 02/04/2019 07:14, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/01/2019 11:51 AM, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
>> clock_getres in the vDSO library has to preserve the same behaviour
>> of posix_get_hrtimer_res().
>>
>> In particular, posix_get_hrtimer_res() does:
>>      sec = 0;
>>      ns = hrtimer_resolution;
>> and hrtimer_resolution depends on the enablement of the high
>> resolution timers that can happen either at compile or at run time.
>>
>> Fix the powerpc vdso implementation of clock_getres keeping a copy of
>> hrtimer_resolution in vdso data and using that directly.
>>
>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
>> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso_datapage.h  |  2 ++
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c         |  2 +-
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c                |  1 +
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/gettimeofday.S | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
>>   5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> [...]
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S
>> index 1e0bc5955a40..b21630079496 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S
>> @@ -160,14 +160,21 @@ V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_getres)
>>   	cror	cr0*4+eq,cr0*4+eq,cr1*4+eq
>>   	bne	cr0,99f
>>   
>> -	li	r3,0
>> -	cmpli	cr0,r4,0
>> +	mflr	r12
>> +  .cfi_register lr,r12
>> +	mr	r11,r4
>> +	bl	__get_datapage@local
>> +	lwz	r5,CLOCK_REALTIME_RES(r3)
>> +	li	r4,0
>> +	cmplwi	r11,0		/* check if res is NULL */
>> +	beq	1f
>> +
>> +	stw	r4,TSPC32_TV_SEC(r11)
>> +	stw	r5,TSPC32_TV_NSEC(r11)
>> +
>> +1:	mtlr	r12
>>   	crclr	cr0*4+so
>> -	beqlr
>> -	lis	r5,CLOCK_REALTIME_RES@h
>> -	ori	r5,r5,CLOCK_REALTIME_RES@l
>> -	stw	r3,TSPC32_TV_SEC(r4)
>> -	stw	r5,TSPC32_TV_NSEC(r4)
>> +	li	r3,0
>>   	blr
> 
> The above can be done simpler, see below
> 
> @@ -160,12 +160,15 @@ V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_getres)
>   	cror	cr0*4+eq,cr0*4+eq,cr1*4+eq
>   	bne	cr0,99f
> 
> +	mflr	r12
> +  .cfi_register lr,r12
> +	bl	__get_datapage@local
> +	lwz	r5,CLOCK_REALTIME_RES(r3)
> +	mtlr	r12
>   	li	r3,0
>   	cmpli	cr0,r4,0
>   	crclr	cr0*4+so
>   	beqlr
> -	lis	r5,CLOCK_REALTIME_RES@h
> -	ori	r5,r5,CLOCK_REALTIME_RES@l
>   	stw	r3,TSPC32_TV_SEC(r4)
>   	stw	r5,TSPC32_TV_NSEC(r4)
>   	blr
> 

Thank you for this, I will update my code accordingly before posting v2.

> Christophe
> 
>>   
>>   	/*
>> @@ -175,6 +182,7 @@ V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_getres)
>>   	 */
>>   99:
>>   	li	r0,__NR_clock_getres
>> +  .cfi_restore lr
>>   	sc
>>   	blr
>>     .cfi_endproc
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/gettimeofday.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/gettimeofday.S
>> index a4ed9edfd5f0..a7e49bddd475 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/gettimeofday.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/gettimeofday.S
>> @@ -190,14 +190,21 @@ V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_getres)
>>   	cror	cr0*4+eq,cr0*4+eq,cr1*4+eq
>>   	bne	cr0,99f
>>   
>> -	li	r3,0
>> -	cmpldi	cr0,r4,0
>> +	mflr	r12
>> +  .cfi_register lr,r12
>> +	mr	r11, r4
>> +	bl	V_LOCAL_FUNC(__get_datapage)
>> +	lwz	r5,CLOCK_REALTIME_RES(r3)
>> +	li	r4,0
>> +	cmpldi	r11,0		/* check if res is NULL */
>> +	beq	1f
>> +
>> +	std	r4,TSPC64_TV_SEC(r11)
>> +	std	r5,TSPC64_TV_NSEC(r11)
>> +
>> +1:	mtlr	r12
>>   	crclr	cr0*4+so
>> -	beqlr
>> -	lis	r5,CLOCK_REALTIME_RES@h
>> -	ori	r5,r5,CLOCK_REALTIME_RES@l
>> -	std	r3,TSPC64_TV_SEC(r4)
>> -	std	r5,TSPC64_TV_NSEC(r4)
>> +	li	r3,0
>>   	blr
> 
> The same type of simplification applies here too.
> 
> Christophe
> 
> 
>>   
>>   	/*
>> @@ -205,6 +212,7 @@ V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_getres)
>>   	 */
>>   99:
>>   	li	r0,__NR_clock_getres
>> +  .cfi_restore lr
>>   	sc
>>   	blr
>>     .cfi_endproc
>>

-- 
Regards,
Vincenzo

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-02  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-01 11:51 [PATCH 0/5] Fix vDSO clock_getres() Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-01 11:51 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64: " Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-15 17:35   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-04-16 12:42     ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-16 14:23       ` Will Deacon
2019-04-01 11:51 ` [PATCH 2/5] powerpc: " Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-02  5:54   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-04-02  9:00     ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-02  6:14   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-04-02  9:01     ` Vincenzo Frascino [this message]
2019-04-01 11:51 ` [PATCH 3/5] s390: " Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-03  9:38   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2019-04-03 10:06     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-03 14:21       ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-01 11:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] nds32: " Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-01 11:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] kselftest: Extend vDSO selftest to clock_getres Vincenzo Frascino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f8206e04-79d2-87e7-0cf0-04d099b3ad40@arm.com \
    --to=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=deanbo422@gmail.com \
    --cc=green.hu@gmail.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).