From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.187]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C43DDEC8 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:41:56 +1000 (EST) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c27so1093817rvf for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:41:54 -0600 From: "Grant Likely" Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca To: "Stephen Neuendorffer" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consolidate XILINX_VIRTEX board support In-Reply-To: <20070806233630.95E233B0080@mail28-fra.bigfish.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <200708070124.04748.arnd@arndb.de> <20070806233630.95E233B0080@mail28-fra.bigfish.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 8/6/07, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote: > > > On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Wolfgang Reissnegger wrote: > > > > > > Make support for Xilinx boards more generic, making it easier > > > to add new boards. Add initial support for xupv2p and ml410 boards. > > > > I really think we shouldn't add stuff to arch/ppc at this point, > > it has been deprecated for over two years now. > > This is a good point... In fact the other patch (although tiny) is > more important, since it affects drivers, which should work in > arch/powerpc. Thanks for the feedback anyway! > > On this topic: has anyone tried using the recent Walnut patches for > arch/powerpc? I briefly took a look at starting to port the Virtex > support to arch/powerpc but I'm a bit lost as to where to start... :) I plan to start hacking on it this week if things go well. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. grant.likely@secretlab.ca (403) 399-0195