From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.177]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73E0DDEEE for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 03:42:45 +1000 (EST) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m28so777055wag for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:42:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:42:44 -0600 From: "Grant Likely" Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca To: "Robert Woodworth" Subject: Re: Xilinx Virtex4 FX PPC In-Reply-To: <1187630817.6336.34.camel@PisteOff> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <1187625654.6336.28.camel@PisteOff> <20070820113549.7cc3ac45@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> <1187630817.6336.34.camel@PisteOff> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 8/20/07, Robert Woodworth wrote: > CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION fixed it!! > > What are the opinions out there? > Kernel fp or glibc soft-fp?? kernel fp is slower, but easier to get going (you can use just about any distro). soft-fp results in faster floating point execution, but your entire rootfs needs to be compiled with soft-fp. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. grant.likely@secretlab.ca (403) 399-0195