From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66987DDE36 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:25:49 +1000 (EST) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m34so61758wag for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:25:48 -0600 From: "Grant Likely" Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca To: "Robert Woodworth" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add support for xupv2p and ml410 boards. In-Reply-To: <1187751864.6266.6.camel@PisteOff> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <1187743993171-git-send-email-wolfgang.reissnegger@xilinx.com> <1187743993360-git-send-email-wolfgang.reissnegger@xilinx.com> <20070822005048.CF66B31005A@mail77-blu.bigfish.com> <1187751864.6266.6.camel@PisteOff> Cc: Stephen Neuendorffer , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 8/21/07, Robert Woodworth wrote: > Should the xparameters????.h file *really* be included in the tree? > > This file is completely board/EDK/ISE/synthesis specific. I'd rather it > not be included and have people copy theirs from EDK. > Or as I have done, sym-link it from my EDK project. Including xparams for the default xilinx reference designs seems reasonable to me. For custom designs, not so much. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. grant.likely@secretlab.ca (403) 399-0195