* [RFC] Get rid of linuxppc-embedded?
@ 2007-10-01 19:24 Mark A. Greer
2007-10-01 20:59 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark A. Greer @ 2007-10-01 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
With the merging of the powerpc trees I'm not sure there is a clear
reason why we have 2 separate powerpc lists anymore (linuxppc-dev and
linuxppc-embedded).
linuxppc-embedded is fairly low volume/noise but there is still the occasional
patch posted there that should really be posted to linuxppc-dev. I think
it would be nice to have just one list where all eyes are focused.
Is it time to get rid of linuxppc-embedded?
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] Get rid of linuxppc-embedded?
2007-10-01 19:24 [RFC] Get rid of linuxppc-embedded? Mark A. Greer
@ 2007-10-01 20:59 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-02 0:15 ` Mark A. Greer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2007-10-01 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark A. Greer; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On 10/1/07, Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> wrote:
> With the merging of the powerpc trees I'm not sure there is a clear
> reason why we have 2 separate powerpc lists anymore (linuxppc-dev and
> linuxppc-embedded).
>
> linuxppc-embedded is fairly low volume/noise but there is still the occasional
> patch posted there that should really be posted to linuxppc-dev. I think
> it would be nice to have just one list where all eyes are focused.
>
> Is it time to get rid of linuxppc-embedded?
Ack Ack Ack!
I agree 100%
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely@secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] Get rid of linuxppc-embedded?
2007-10-01 20:59 ` Grant Likely
@ 2007-10-02 0:15 ` Mark A. Greer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark A. Greer @ 2007-10-02 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 02:59:14PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 10/1/07, Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> wrote:
> > With the merging of the powerpc trees I'm not sure there is a clear
> > reason why we have 2 separate powerpc lists anymore (linuxppc-dev and
> > linuxppc-embedded).
> >
> > linuxppc-embedded is fairly low volume/noise but there is still the occasional
> > patch posted there that should really be posted to linuxppc-dev. I think
> > it would be nice to have just one list where all eyes are focused.
> >
> > Is it time to get rid of linuxppc-embedded?
>
> Ack Ack Ack!
>
> I agree 100%
Okay. Even if we keep the list around, we should update MAINTAINERS to
only refer to -dev. I'll post a patch in a second.
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-02 0:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-01 19:24 [RFC] Get rid of linuxppc-embedded? Mark A. Greer
2007-10-01 20:59 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-02 0:15 ` Mark A. Greer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).