From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <glikely@secretlab.ca>
Message-ID: <fa686aa40710011359x188d2930y38cd8a6faacb0f26@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:59:14 -0600
From: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca
To: "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Get rid of linuxppc-embedded?
In-Reply-To: <20071001192459.GB5785@mag.az.mvista.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
References: <20071001192459.GB5785@mag.az.mvista.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On 10/1/07, Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> wrote:
> With the merging of the powerpc trees I'm not sure there is a clear
> reason why we have 2 separate powerpc lists anymore (linuxppc-dev and
> linuxppc-embedded).
>
> linuxppc-embedded is fairly low volume/noise but there is still the occasional
> patch posted there that should really be posted to linuxppc-dev.  I think
> it would be nice to have just one list where all eyes are focused.
>
> Is it time to get rid of linuxppc-embedded?

Ack Ack Ack!

I agree 100%

g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely@secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195