From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.179]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33333DDE32 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 04:22:53 +1000 (EST) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m28so5839310wag for ; Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:22:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:22:47 -0600 From: "Grant Likely" Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca To: "Andrei Konovalov" , linuxppc-dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Patch series to add of_platform binding to xilinxfb In-Reply-To: <4703C8A7.8070001@ru.mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <20071001155024.6114.47993.stgit@trillian.cg.shawcable.net> <4703C8A7.8070001@ru.mvista.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 10/3/07, Andrei Konovalov wrote: > Hi Grant, > > Grant Likely wrote: > > (resend due to mailer issues. Apologies to anyone receiving this twice) > > > > This patch series reworks the Xilinx framebuffer driver and then adds > > an of_platform bus binding. The of_platform bus binding is needed to use > > the driver in arch/powerpc platforms. > > The patch series looks good (though I did no testing on my site; seems > the Xilinx ML* boards should not be hurt). I've tested under both arch/ppc and arch/powerpc on a custom board that I have here. > > BTW, I don't follow the linuxppc list close enough at the moment. > What boards are going to use of_platform bus binding? Any Xilinx platform (powerpc & microblaze) using the xilinx framebuffer (ml300, ml403, etc). > ML40x/ML300 are not in the arch/powerpc yet, right? 2.6.24 will have Xilinx Virtex support in arch/powerpc. It's already in Josh's 4xx maintainer tree. > Do I recall correct that you have a mpc5200 based one with two xilinxfb's? Nope, I haven't seen such a beast myself. > PS > I don't think you need an ack from me. > If this is not true, let me know, and I'll ack the patch series You are the author after all. :-) Your ack is probably appropriate, if not absolutely necessary. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. grant.likely@secretlab.ca (403) 399-0195