linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: "Timur Tabi" <timur@freescale.com>
Cc: PowerPC dev list <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Audio codec device tree entries
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:28:42 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa686aa40710240828p532e8e4axf1f9b9ad4cd324f8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471F5FC4.1040804@freescale.com>

On 10/24/07, Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com> wrote:
> Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> > What I meant was that there is no attempt to describe how the codec is
> > connected to the external world. Those connections are described in
> > the fabric driver.
>
> Hmmm, I'm not sure I'm okay with that.  We can always add properties to those
> nodes if it's necessary.  However, now you're basically defining some parts of
> the board layout in the DTS, and some parts in the fabric driver.  On PowerPC
> platforms, the fabric driver is supposed to get board layout information from
> the device tree.

No, not always; if the description is too complex (like gpio's for
instance) then it is perfectly valid to build the knowledge into the
platform code.  It should be avoided; but the device tree doesn't need
to describe *everything*.

>
> > i2s@2200 {           // PSC2
> >      compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-psc-i2s","fsl,mpc5200-psc-i2s";
> >      cell-index = <1>;
> >      reg = <2200 100>;
> >      interrupts = <2 2 0>;
> >      interrupt-parent = <&mpc5200_pic>;
> >      codec2: i2s-codec@2 {
>
> This should probably be codec0, since it's the first code on this I2S bus.
>
> >            compatible = "wolson,wm8750";
> >            reg = <2>;
> >            i2c-handle = <&i2c@3d00>;
> >      };
> > };
> >
> > i2c@3d00 {
> >      compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-i2c", "fsl,mpc5200-i2c", "fsl-i2c";
> >      #address-cells = <1>;
> >      #size-cells = <0>;
> >      cell-index = <0>;
> >      reg = <3d00 40>;
> >      interrupts = <2 f 0>;
> >      interrupt-parent = <&mpc5200_pic>;
> >      fsl5200-clocking;
> > }
>
> My vote is for this version.  In fact, I think it *has* to be this way.  If
> you're using a CS4270 codec (as I am), the I2C interface is *optional*.  So I
> want the I2S node to point to the I2C node if it exists.

It doesn't have to be this way.  If the codec does not have a control
interface, then it can happily be a child of the i2s node.  But if it
*does*; don't break convention by separating it from it's control
interface.

I strongly recommend following the lead of ethernet phys and mdio busses here.

Cheers,
g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely@secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-24 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-23  1:59 Audio codec device tree entries Jon Smirl
2007-10-23  2:57 ` David Gibson
2007-10-23  3:57 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-23  8:06   ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-10-23 15:27 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-23 16:56   ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-10-23 22:29     ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 14:13       ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 15:00         ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 15:07           ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 15:28             ` Grant Likely [this message]
2007-10-24 23:52               ` David Gibson
2007-10-24 15:16           ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 15:20             ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 15:28               ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 15:43                 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 15:54                   ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 16:01                     ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 16:39                       ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 16:41                         ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 16:47                           ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 16:38                     ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 16:41                       ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 16:52                         ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 17:01                       ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 17:13                         ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 17:13                         ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 19:31                           ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 19:41                             ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 19:56                               ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-25  0:04                       ` David Gibson
2007-10-25  0:17                         ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-25  0:38                           ` David Gibson
2007-10-25  3:11                             ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-25 16:14                               ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 23:55                     ` David Gibson
2007-10-24 15:23             ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 15:40               ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 15:54                 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 15:08         ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 15:19           ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-25  0:01             ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fa686aa40710240828p532e8e4axf1f9b9ad4cd324f8@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=timur@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).