From: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: "Timur Tabi" <timur@freescale.com>
Cc: PowerPC dev list <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Audio codec device tree entries
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:28:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa686aa40710240828p532e8e4axf1f9b9ad4cd324f8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471F5FC4.1040804@freescale.com>
On 10/24/07, Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com> wrote:
> Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> > What I meant was that there is no attempt to describe how the codec is
> > connected to the external world. Those connections are described in
> > the fabric driver.
>
> Hmmm, I'm not sure I'm okay with that. We can always add properties to those
> nodes if it's necessary. However, now you're basically defining some parts of
> the board layout in the DTS, and some parts in the fabric driver. On PowerPC
> platforms, the fabric driver is supposed to get board layout information from
> the device tree.
No, not always; if the description is too complex (like gpio's for
instance) then it is perfectly valid to build the knowledge into the
platform code. It should be avoided; but the device tree doesn't need
to describe *everything*.
>
> > i2s@2200 { // PSC2
> > compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-psc-i2s","fsl,mpc5200-psc-i2s";
> > cell-index = <1>;
> > reg = <2200 100>;
> > interrupts = <2 2 0>;
> > interrupt-parent = <&mpc5200_pic>;
> > codec2: i2s-codec@2 {
>
> This should probably be codec0, since it's the first code on this I2S bus.
>
> > compatible = "wolson,wm8750";
> > reg = <2>;
> > i2c-handle = <&i2c@3d00>;
> > };
> > };
> >
> > i2c@3d00 {
> > compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-i2c", "fsl,mpc5200-i2c", "fsl-i2c";
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> > cell-index = <0>;
> > reg = <3d00 40>;
> > interrupts = <2 f 0>;
> > interrupt-parent = <&mpc5200_pic>;
> > fsl5200-clocking;
> > }
>
> My vote is for this version. In fact, I think it *has* to be this way. If
> you're using a CS4270 codec (as I am), the I2C interface is *optional*. So I
> want the I2S node to point to the I2C node if it exists.
It doesn't have to be this way. If the codec does not have a control
interface, then it can happily be a child of the i2s node. But if it
*does*; don't break convention by separating it from it's control
interface.
I strongly recommend following the lead of ethernet phys and mdio busses here.
Cheers,
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely@secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-24 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-23 1:59 Audio codec device tree entries Jon Smirl
2007-10-23 2:57 ` David Gibson
2007-10-23 3:57 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-23 8:06 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-10-23 15:27 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-23 16:56 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-10-23 22:29 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 14:13 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 15:00 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 15:07 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 15:28 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2007-10-24 23:52 ` David Gibson
2007-10-24 15:16 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 15:20 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 15:28 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 15:43 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 15:54 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 16:01 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 16:39 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 16:41 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 16:47 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 16:38 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 16:41 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 16:52 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 17:01 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 17:13 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 17:13 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 19:31 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 19:41 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 19:56 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-25 0:04 ` David Gibson
2007-10-25 0:17 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-25 0:38 ` David Gibson
2007-10-25 3:11 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-25 16:14 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 23:55 ` David Gibson
2007-10-24 15:23 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-24 15:40 ` Timur Tabi
2007-10-24 15:54 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 15:08 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 15:19 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-25 0:01 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa686aa40710240828p532e8e4axf1f9b9ad4cd324f8@mail.gmail.com \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=timur@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).