From: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Subject: Re: Apparent kernel bug with GDB on ppc405
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:45:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa686aa40710251945l51604c5vdf0b49b03b9a1a57@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193363202.7018.36.camel@pasglop>
On 10/25/07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 14:46 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> >
> > My first suspicion was a dcache/icache coherency issue in
> > copy_to_user_page, so I added flush_dcache_icache_page(page) here to
> > no avail. On closer inspection, it looks like both icache and dcache
> > are already being flushed by flush_icache_user_range().
> >
> > Adding printk(".") (or any printk) in this function here fixes things
> > (serial console at 115k), while printk("") and udelay(100) do not.
> > Which still suggests an icache bug..?
> >
> > Any suggestions?
>
> I think you're hitting a known bug of 44x support. Those CPUs have a
> crazy virtually tagged icache and the kernel doesn't deal with it at all
> (pretty much...). We just are lucky things generally work :-)
>
> That means among other things that flush_icache_* will not work because
> they kmap pages and use that mapping. The only way to flush icache user
> pages with 44x is to actually flush with the user virtual address
> (meaning you have to be in the current context, and you probably need to
> have a TLB entry there... yuck)... or just blow the whole icache away.
This is actually 405. Does that have the same issue?
Cheers,
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely@secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-26 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-24 19:46 Apparent kernel bug with GDB on ppc405 Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 20:28 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 20:42 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 20:46 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 21:54 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 22:27 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 22:32 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 22:39 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 22:40 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-26 1:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-24 22:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-26 1:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 20:41 ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-27 1:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-27 1:27 ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-24 20:34 ` David Daney
2007-10-26 1:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 1:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 2:45 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2007-10-26 3:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 14:41 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-27 1:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-27 7:32 ` [PATCH/RFC] powerpc: Pass PID argument to _tlbie (WAS: Apparent kernel bug with GDB on ppc405) Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-29 12:08 ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-29 20:15 ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-29 20:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-29 21:13 ` Matt Mackall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa686aa40710251945l51604c5vdf0b49b03b9a1a57@mail.gmail.com \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).