From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.251]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DADDDDE36 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2007 07:50:37 +1100 (EST) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b2so48679ana for ; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:50:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:50:36 -0700 From: "Grant Likely" Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca To: "Jon Smirl" Subject: Re: use of fsl, in lite5200b.dts in git current In-Reply-To: <9e4733910711081240l458a5e7h4898fb12e511f29a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <9e4733910711071355l75da5444kb7082692f1bdc0@mail.gmail.com> <4732396D.4040904@genesi-usa.com> <9e4733910711071418u5914f188nffc7ab50e62cc88e@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910711081240l458a5e7h4898fb12e511f29a@mail.gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 11/8/07, Jon Smirl wrote: > No one has answered this yet. It makes no sense at all to mix use of > the vendor prefix on some compatible entries and not on others. The > syntax of compatible entries needs to be consistent. The 5200 binding is poorly done on this point. I've got a patch that adds the 'fsl,' prefix so that future 5200 device trees are consistent with the recommended practices (while not breaking older boards of course) g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. grant.likely@secretlab.ca (403) 399-0195