From: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Cc: PowerPC dev list <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: Revisited, audio codec device tree entries.
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:33:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa686aa40711190933r3cbeb51bw7b9073a40f8396ed@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e4733910711190851g3e1f2ef9k5f87c7c2dae929ef@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/19/07, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/19/07, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> > On 11/19/07, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 11/19/07, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> > > > On 11/19/07, Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com> wrote:
> > > > > Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In the ALSA SOC model the i2s, codec and ac97 drivers are all generic.
> > > > > > A fabric driver tells specifically how a generic codec is wired into
> > > > > > the board. What I haven't been able figure out is how to load the
> > > > > > right fabric driver.
> > > > >
> > > > > Do not use the device tree to load the fabric driver!
> > > >
> > > > Heh, technically you can't use the device tree to load any device
> > > > drivers, it's just a data structure. :-)
> > > >
> > > > You probably mean "don't use the of_platform bus to load the fabric
> > > > driver". He still needs to use the data in the device tree to decide
> > > > what fabric drivers to use. of_platform_bus would be awkward to use
> > > > for this because the node describing the fabric doesn't cleanly sit on
> > > > any particular bus (ie. it describes the board; it does not describe
> > > > the device).
> > > >
> > > > In this case; it probably is appropriate to have the platform code
> > > > instantiate a platform_device for the fabric (instead of an
> > > > of_platform device) which the fabric driver can bind against.
> > >
> > > First, I have platform bus turned off in my builds. Platform bus is a
> > > place where cruft accumulates that really belongs somewhere else. For
> > > example when I turned it off I discovered that there was a PC speaker
> > > driver in my kernel and well as several drivers from 82xx chips.
> > >
> > > ALSA creates it own bus like i2c. My fabric driver sits on this bus.,
> > > Kconfig attributes control if it is built-in. I've altered the i2c
> > > code to look for child device tree nodes and then load the appropriate
> > > drivers.
> >
> > Can't you then instantiate the ALSA bus device in your board platform
> > code? Then when the driver is registered, the bus should call it's
> > probe routine.
>
> Yes, I can do that. I have just been resisting creating a code linkage
> from arch/powerpc/platform/xx to sound/alsa/soc/powerpc. I also need
> to create the fabric driver after alsa has made the bus,
> subsys_initcall(asoc_bus_init);
Hmmm, you could add a drivers_initcall to the platform code, but that
only works if the ALSA code is compiled statically. It doesn't work
for modules. :-(
You might be stuck with using either a platform_device or an
of_platform_device as a stepping stone to creating the device on the
ALSA fabric driver.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely@secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-19 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-18 18:10 Revisited, audio codec device tree entries Jon Smirl
2007-11-18 20:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-11-18 21:49 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-18 22:46 ` Matt Sealey
2007-11-18 23:31 ` Matt Sealey
2007-11-18 23:47 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 0:12 ` David Gibson
2007-11-19 0:22 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 12:48 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-11-20 0:22 ` David Gibson
2007-11-19 16:31 ` Matt Sealey
2007-11-19 17:05 ` Scott Wood
2007-11-19 18:55 ` Grant Likely
2007-11-20 0:33 ` David Gibson
2007-11-19 12:07 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-11-19 16:58 ` Matt Sealey
2007-11-20 1:42 ` David Gibson
2007-11-19 14:57 ` Timur Tabi
2007-11-19 15:33 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 15:02 ` Timur Tabi
2007-11-19 15:15 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-11-19 15:33 ` Grant Likely
2007-11-19 16:00 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 16:31 ` Grant Likely
2007-11-19 16:51 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 17:33 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2007-11-19 19:20 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 19:28 ` Grant Likely
2007-11-20 0:59 ` David Gibson
2007-11-26 15:51 ` Timur Tabi
2007-11-26 16:38 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-26 16:40 ` Timur Tabi
2007-11-19 16:45 ` Timur Tabi
2007-11-19 22:37 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 16:44 ` Timur Tabi
2007-11-19 16:53 ` Grant Likely
2007-11-19 16:55 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 15:37 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-19 15:42 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa686aa40711190933r3cbeb51bw7b9073a40f8396ed@mail.gmail.com \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=timur@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).