From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.227]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7643DE8E4 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 05:51:44 +1100 (EST) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h27so3167029wxd.15 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:51:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:51:41 -0600 From: "Grant Likely" Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca To: "Bartlomiej Sieka" Subject: Re: Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git In-Reply-To: <47E938A8.9000103@semihalf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <20080317222836.AFA66241A2@gemini.denx.de> <47E938A8.9000103@semihalf.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Bartlomiej Sieka wrote: > Grant Likely wrote: > > The one part that I have a really strong opinion on is that there > > should be a full featured mpc5200 defconfig for build testing. Beyond > > that (and if ojn can also be appeased) I can probably be convinced. :-) > > Hi Grant, > > How to deal with a situation where I need a particular PHY driver from > libphy compiled in the kernel for one of the MPC5200 boards? Adding it > to mpc5200_defconfig doesn't seem like a right thing to do. Why not? mpc5200_defconfig is all about compile and runtime testing on many platforms to make sure drivers play well together. I have no problem adding more drivers to the mpc5200 defconfig. (In fact, I encourage it). > How to > convince you (and appease ojn) to accept a patch that adds a > board-specific defconfig that only slightly differs from > mpc5200_defconfig? :) I'm thinking 'optimized' defconfigs should go into a subdirectory. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.