From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.250]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875B8DE039 for ; Sun, 25 May 2008 14:56:26 +1000 (EST) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c34so317293anc.78 for ; Sat, 24 May 2008 21:56:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 22:56:25 -0600 From: "Grant Likely" Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca To: "David Brownell" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] spi: Add OF binding support for SPI busses In-Reply-To: <200805241045.47448.david-b@pacbell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <20080516193054.28030.35126.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> <48384D13.6010608@scram.de> <200805241045.47448.david-b@pacbell.net> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, fabrizio.garetto@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:45 AM, David Brownell wrote: > On Saturday 24 May 2008, Grant Likely wrote: >> > Isn't the same true for drivers/of/gpio.c or drivers/of/of_i2c.c, as well? >> >> I would argue 'yes!' > > ... all the more reason to have the SPI glue go there too, > matching the ACPI/PCI precedent as well as those others! Alright; I give! I'll put it in drivers/of. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.