linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: "Anton Vorontsov" <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
	Gary Jennejohn <garyj@denx.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@drzeus.cx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC v3] OF: OpenFirmware bindings for the mmc_spi driver
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:45:17 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa686aa40806050945h5e61910flb63a8d00e1d2b0e8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080605161624.GA517@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru>

On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Anton Vorontsov
<avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
> Here is v3. I'm out of ideas if you won't like it. :-)
>
> v3:
> - Now these bindings are using bus notifiers chain, thus we adhere to the
>  spi bus.
>
>  By the way, this scheme (IMO) looks good for I2C devices which needs
>  platform_data extracted from the device tree too (Cc'ing Jochen).
>
> - Plus changed the OF bindings themselves, implemented voltage-range
>  property. (Pierre, please take a look at vddrange_to_ocrmask(). I
>  wonder if you would like this in the MMC core instead, with a kernel
>  doc, of course.)
>
> v2:
> - Bindings were adhered to the MMC_SPI driver. Withdrawn by Pierre Ossman.

Personally I think your v2 was better, and if I'm interpreting
Pierre's comments correctly I think his main point is that instead of
using the 'stock' probe/remove hooks for the spi mmc driver, the
driver should be mildly reworked to provide a common block of code
that can be used by both the OF and non-OF versions of the
probe/remove routines.  I also think that is the way to go.

Cheers,
g.


-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-05 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-05 16:16 [PATCH] [RFC v3] OF: OpenFirmware bindings for the mmc_spi driver Anton Vorontsov
2008-06-05 16:45 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2008-06-05 17:27   ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-06-05 17:36     ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 18:00       ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-06-05 18:18         ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 18:31           ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-06-05 18:42             ` Grant Likely
     [not found] ` <20080614175723.209e93dc@mjolnir.drzeus.cx>
2008-06-16 13:23   ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-06-16 14:13   ` Grant Likely
2008-07-03  3:26 ` Jon Smirl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fa686aa40806050945h5e61910flb63a8d00e1d2b0e8@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=drzeus-mmc@drzeus.cx \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=garyj@denx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).