From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.241]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F76FDE109 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 23:57:02 +1000 (EST) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c34so432258anc.78 for ; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 06:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 07:57:00 -0600 From: "Grant Likely" Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca To: "Juergen Beisert" Subject: Re: Comments on device tree for pcm030 In-Reply-To: <200806090956.32160.jbe@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <9e4733910806081208r1a8d0987j6eab0d73bc446640@mail.gmail.com> <200806090956.32160.jbe@pengutronix.de> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, wsa@pengutronix.de List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Juergen Beisert wrote: > On Monday 09 June 2008 01:28, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Jon Smirl wrote: >> > Device tree has an entry for AC97 on PSC1. I don't think the Phytec >> > module or carrier board has AC97 hardware. >> >> Might be a bug > > NACK. The baseboard for the pcm030 CPU board has AC97 hardware connected to > PSC1. And it plays audio... Okay, I didn't know. >> > The RTC chip says pcf8563, phytec doc says it is a pcf8564. >> >> Sounds like a bug > > These devices are mostly the same. You can use the pcf8563 driver for the > pcf8564. Then compatible should be something 'compatible = "nxp,pcf8564", "nxp,pcf8563";' Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.