From: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: "Scott Wood" <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: David Jander <david.jander@protonic.nl>, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Added support for PRTLVT based boards (MPC5121)
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:20:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa686aa40806112320n4cfb667exb07eb364691c9d60@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48501248.8010104@freescale.com>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote:
> David Jander wrote:
>> +config MPC5121_GENERIC
>> + bool
>> + default n
>> +
>> config MPC5121_ADS
>> bool "Freescale MPC5121E ADS"
>> depends on PPC_MULTIPLATFORM && PPC32
>> select DEFAULT_UIMAGE
>> select PPC_MPC5121
>> + select MPC5121_GENERIC
>> help
>> This option enables support for the MPC5121E ADS board.
>> default n
>> +
>> +config PRTLVT
>> + bool "Protonic LVT family of MPC5121 based boards"
>> + depends on PPC_MULTIPLATFORM && PPC32
>> + select DEFAULT_UIMAGE
>> + select PPC_MPC5121
>> + select MPC5121_GENERIC
>> + help
>> + This option enables support for the Protonic LVT family (ZANMCU
>> and VICVT2).
>> + default n
>
> Can we leave out the "default n" lines? They're no-ops.
>
> I don't think these configs should depend on an option (PPC_MULTIPLATFORM)
> that is described as "Generic desktop/server/laptop"...
PPC_MULTIPLATFORM may be described poorly, but it is the appropriate
option. However, it should probably be that the whole 5121 support
Kconfig should depend on MULTIPLATFORM, not individual board ports.
That being said, David is just duplicating what was already done for
the ADS board, so I'm not going to harp on him to change it in this
patch.
Cheers,
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-12 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-11 9:43 [PATCH 1/2] Added support for PRTLVT based boards (MPC5121) David Jander
2008-06-11 9:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] Re-added support for FEC on MPC5121 from Freescale LTIB David Jander
2008-06-11 18:19 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-12 10:33 ` David Jander
2008-06-12 13:29 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-12 13:57 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-17 17:33 ` John Rigby
2008-06-11 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] Added support for PRTLVT based boards (MPC5121) Scott Wood
2008-06-12 6:20 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2008-06-12 6:54 ` David Jander
2008-06-12 13:15 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-12 6:36 ` Grant Likely
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-12 11:44 David Jander
2008-06-12 14:10 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-13 4:19 ` David Gibson
2008-06-13 5:12 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa686aa40806112320n4cfb667exb07eb364691c9d60@mail.gmail.com \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=david.jander@protonic.nl \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).