From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com (ag-out-0708.google.com [72.14.246.243]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BCBDE05B for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 00:29:49 +1000 (EST) Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 8so13161070agc.0 for ; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 07:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 08:29:47 -0600 From: "Grant Likely" Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca To: "Josh Boyer" Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] powerpc/bootwrapper: Allow user to specify additional default targets In-Reply-To: <20080707100704.26f1630c@zod.rchland.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <20080701175852.32575.39707.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> <20080707091818.72d584fe@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <20080707100704.26f1630c@zod.rchland.ibm.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 07:34:23 -0600 Grant Likely wrote: >> Specifically the case I'm thinking of is when a user of a Xilinx FPGA >> drops a new .dts file into arch/powerpc/boot/dts (say >> 'super-sexy-platform.dts'). However, instead of modifying the >> Makefile or always typing 'make simpleImage.super-sexy-platform', then >> can add 'simpleImage.super-sexy-platform' to their defconfig which I >> can see being easier for someone to get their head around. > > Yeah, I thought about the Virtex case with the differing bitstreams > after I sent out my original question. For purposes like that, this > seems like a great fit. For truly discrete boards, I prefer discrete > defconfigs. > > So overall I see value in the patch. If nobody else has objections, > then it's fine with me. so.... can I have an ack? :-) g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.