From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-gx0-f16.google.com (mail-gx0-f16.google.com [209.85.217.16]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404E8DE038 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:26:32 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:26:31 -0700 From: "Grant Likely" To: "Li Yang" , "Wood Scott-B07421" , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: The usage of compatible 'simple-bus' In-Reply-To: <20090107020006.GD13731@yookeroo.seuss> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <20090106014323.GB29456@yookeroo.seuss> <3A45394FD742FA419B760BB8D398F9ED0B38C9@zch01exm26.fsl.freescale.net> <20090107020006.GD13731@yookeroo.seuss> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:00 PM, David Gibson wrote: > As Grant says, you're thinking about what drivers will do with things > rather than what the actual hardware setup is, which is what the > device tree should describe. > > I see two sensible options for this situation: > - Move the MDIO node to outside the gianfar MAC node. I think > this is already done on some boards with gianfar? mpc5200 FEC is another example of this. > - Explicitly add the gianfar device to the list of things to > scan for of_platform subdevices. Ack. I 100% agree. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.