From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.28]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E34DDFC9 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:58:07 +1100 (EST) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 5so3305506ywh.39 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:58:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:58:05 -0700 From: "Grant Likely" To: "Benjamin Herrenschmidt" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] powerpc: Generic device tree for all AmigaOne boards In-Reply-To: <1231736850.22571.17.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <20090107135457.234150@gmx.net> <20090107140132.140980@gmx.net> <1231736850.22571.17.camel@pasglop> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 09:41 -0700, Grant Likely wrote: >> For the flattened device tree, I think we've settled on the convention >> that every node with an IRQ connection should have both the >> interrupt-parent and interrupts properties. (ie. don't rely on the >> parent node's interrupt-parent property.) > > Ah ? I use the trick of relying on the parent node regulary :-) Where > did we discuss that ? It is also entirely possible that I'm smoking something exotic. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.