From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.28]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18582DE2CA for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:26:51 +1100 (EST) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 5so388784ywh.39 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:26:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:26:50 -0700 From: "Grant Likely" To: "Michael Ellerman" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] powerpc: Remove printk-only progress implementations In-Reply-To: <32db977796782e4d132edb123a64b2437e5ea830.1232001793.git.michael@ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <32db977796782e4d132edb123a64b2437e5ea830.1232001793.git.michael@ellerman.id.au> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Several platforms implement ppc_md.progress as a simple printk. Now that > we have the ppc_progress() wrapper which falls back to printk if no > routine is specified, we can remove all the printk-only progress > implementations. > > This leaves us with iSeries_progress(), rtas_progress() and udbg_progress(). > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Acked-by: Grant Likely -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.