From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] powerpc/5200: Rework GPT driver to also be an IRQ controller
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:42:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa686aa40902041242j490e1ee0sf3916edd5804e89d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090204195506.GA32613@pengutronix.de>
Hey Wolfram, thanks for the review.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> I have been told to move such a changelog below the dashed lines,
> because it is not so important for the git-history.
This is only in my email for review purposes. It won't be in the git commit.
>> + status = in_be32(&gpt->regs->status) | MPC52xx_GPT_STATUS_IRQMASK;
>
> Like I mentioned in my first review, the following if-clause is always
> true. You probably mean "& MPC52xx_GPT_STATUS_IRQMASK"?
You're right. I missed this from your first review. Fixed.
>> +/* ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> + * GPIOLIB hooks
>> + */
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)
>> +static inline struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gc_to_mpc52xx_gpt(struct gpio_chip *gc)
>> +{
>> + return container_of(to_of_gpio_chip(gc), struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv,of_gc);
>
> Space after ','. As it is now, this is a checkpatch-error. Lines over 80
> chars are a warning.
This is on purpose as I described earlier. Checkpatch is not God, and
the cure is worse than the disease. (Granted, the disease is
equivalent to a running nose, and the cure to cheap kleenex, but hey,
it's still my decision).
>> +#else /* defined(CONFIG_SYSFS) */
>> +static void mpc52xx_gpt_create_attribs(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *) { return 0; }
>> +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_SYSFS) */
>
> Hmmm, I still have problems with this sysfs-entry. If you say that this
> is good for debugging, then please make it #DEBUG at least. Imagine
> every driver doing such things, this adds bloat. I'd still rather
> suggest using
>
> ~ memedit /dev/mem
> -> map <MBAR> 0x4000
> -> md 0x600
>
> which does the same and even allows for more (writing for example).
I understand your argument, but I'm still going to leave it in and
leave it enabled for now. I will consider removing it after a release
or too.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-04 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-04 18:23 [PATCH v4] powerpc/5200: Rework GPT driver to also be an IRQ controller Grant Likely
2009-02-04 19:55 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-02-04 20:42 ` Grant Likely [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa686aa40902041242j490e1ee0sf3916edd5804e89d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).