linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	Linuxppc-dev Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: removing get_immrbase()??
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:54:55 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa686aa40904230654u4e3908c5v567a2cf473fce6ec@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DC91BA72-AF10-41DD-B610-EDEFD106A811@kernel.crashing.org>

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wro=
te:
>
> On Apr 22, 2009, at 4:33 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
>
>> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>>> I disagree. =A0If you update your kernel you should update your device
>>> tree (thus we have .dts in the kernel tree and not somewhere else).
>>
>> Is this a new policy? =A0I was under the impression that supporting olde=
r
>> device trees, if not too inconvenient, is desirable. =A0I've nack'd
>> patches before that broke backwards compatibility unnecessarily.
>
> The specific issue I'm talking about is the addition of new nodes that mi=
ght
> break old device trees. =A0I have no desire to try and say that I can't a=
dd
> new nodes and code related to them just because old device tree's didn't
> have them.

Ah... yes, you're right.  Never mind my previous reply.

g.

--=20
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-23 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-22 18:38 removing get_immrbase()?? Kumar Gala
2009-04-22 19:35 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-22 20:16   ` Scott Wood
2009-04-22 20:16     ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-22 20:20       ` Scott Wood
2009-04-22 21:31       ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-22 21:33         ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-22 21:39           ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-22 21:46             ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-22 21:54               ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-22 21:57                 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-22 22:07                   ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-22 22:00               ` Scott Wood
2009-04-22 22:00                 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-23 13:54             ` Grant Likely [this message]
2009-04-22 21:38         ` Scott Wood
2009-04-22 21:55           ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-22 22:33             ` Scott Wood
2009-04-23  0:03               ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-23  2:26             ` David Gibson
2009-04-23  3:36               ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-23  4:06                 ` David Gibson
2009-04-23  4:41                   ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-28  4:12                     ` David Gibson
2009-04-28 13:48                       ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-23 13:07                 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-23 15:56                 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-23 13:02               ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-23 13:50                 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-23 14:02                   ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-23 14:06                     ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-23 14:09                       ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-24 14:40                       ` Wrobel Heinz-R39252
2009-04-23 14:13                     ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-23 16:00                   ` Scott Wood
2009-04-23 16:54                     ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-23 17:03                       ` Scott Wood
2009-04-23 17:26                         ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-23 17:59                           ` Scott Wood
2009-04-28  4:25                   ` David Gibson
2009-04-28  4:21                 ` David Gibson
2009-04-23 13:53         ` Grant Likely
2009-04-23 14:03           ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-28  4:26           ` David Gibson
2009-04-22 19:44 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-22 20:00   ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-22 20:30   ` Scott Wood
2009-04-23 13:53 ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fa686aa40904230654u4e3908c5v567a2cf473fce6ec@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=timur@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).