From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.30]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24536DDE1A for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:07:23 +1000 (EST) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so1296664yxb.39 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:07:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090427.025436.68188155.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090425224458.32392.31296.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20090427.025436.68188155.davem@davemloft.net> From: Grant Likely Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:07:07 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] OF device tree handling of PHY drivers To: David Miller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, afleming@freescale.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:54 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Grant Likely > Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:52:34 -0600 > >> This series adds common code for reading PHY connection data out of >> the OpenFirmware device tree. =A0This simplifies the network drivers >> which use the device tree and which currently implement their own >> solutions for reading the PHY data out of the device tree directly. >> >> I would like to see this series, or at least the core changes (1-4) >> plus the tested drivers (5-8 & 12, but #12 is a new driver and it >> may need more review), go into -next for 2.6.31. >> >> Due to dependencies, I think it is easiest if all of them go in via the >> same tree. =A0David, are you willing to merge them via yours? =A0Four of= the >> patches are outside of drivers/net (patches 1 and 4 touch drivers/of/, >> and patches 9 & 10 touch arch/powerpc), but I personally have no issues >> if those changes go through you. =A0I just need to double check with Ben= H. > > I've applied all of these patches to net-next-2.6, thanks. > >> =A0 git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 next-net > > You know, if you had actually based this tree on net-next-2.6 > I could have pulled from it. =A0I actually tried, and I got a > lot of upstream stuff I wasn't ready to get in that tree just > yet :-/ I know, but the tree I based it on was what I actually tested against. When it came to publishing, I wasn't going to rebase and push out something untested. I hadn't expected it to get pulled so quickly! Thanks! g. > --=20 Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.