From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1790DDF82 for ; Thu, 7 May 2009 12:42:08 +1000 (EST) Received: by gxk20 with SMTP id 20so1031193gxk.9 for ; Wed, 06 May 2009 19:42:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1241640919-4650-1-git-send-email-wd@denx.de> <1241640919-4650-9-git-send-email-wd@denx.de> <20090506221908.3927583420E8@gemini.denx.de> From: Grant Likely Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:41:47 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] mpc5121: Added I2C support. To: Wolfgang Denk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Piotr Ziecik , Detlev Zundel , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Grant Likely wr= ote: > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Grant Likely, >> >> In message = you wrote: >>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> > From: Piotr Ziecik >>> > >>> > - Enabled I2C interrupts on MPC5121. >>> > - Updated Kconfig for i2c-mpc driver. >>> >>> I think this workaround belongs in the driver itself. >> >> Sorry, I don't get it. Which workaround? What exactly should I change? > > Sorry, I misread the patch. =A0Never mind. Actually, on 3rd reading, I think my first impression was correct (even if I was wrong about it being a workaround). This code in mpc512x_init_i2c() is only relevant for i2c busses (it isn't shared with any other drivers). Therefore, it belongs with the i2c bus itself. It does not belong in platform code. Cheers, g. --=20 Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.