linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Eric Millbrandt <emillbrandt@dekaresearch.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: mpc5200 fec error
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:36:11 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa686aa40905191636u6f4a23d0xc8c6c13904a65b8e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A88094362DE0AE49A118AB9B4EB3612403F9DEBC@dekaexchange.deka.local>

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Eric Millbrandt
<emillbrandt@dekaresearch.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w.sang@pengutronix.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 16:57
> To: Robert Schwebel
> Cc: Eric Millbrandt; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: mpc5200 fec error
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:36:45PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
>> Wolfram, have you seen this mail? You recently tested -rt on 2.6.29,
>> right? Did you only test that on the customer hardware or also on the
>> phyCORE-MPC5200B?
>
> So far, I tried only on customer hardware, and that was 2.6.29.2-rt11.
> With
> that setup, I could work with NFS flawlessly, no real stress-testing
> though.
> Testing latest .3-rt is on my todo, will check the phyCOREs, too.
>
> Regards,
>
> =A0 Wolfram
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 | Wo=
lfram Sang
> |
> Industrial Linux Solutions =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 | http://www.p=
engutronix.de/
> |
>
> I am able to reproduce the error using 2.6.29.2-rt11. =A0I was able to
> mitigate the problem by raising the priority of the transmit irq.
> However when running an NFS server on the pcm030 under high cpu load I
> now get
>
> [ =A0132.477503] net eth0: FEC_IEVENT_RFIFO_ERROR
> [ =A0132.892329] net eth0: FEC_IEVENT_RFIFO_ERROR
> [ =A0133.884109] net eth0: FEC_IEVENT_RFIFO_ERROR
> [ =A0134.876059] net eth0: FEC_IEVENT_RFIFO_ERROR
>
> Raising the priority of the rx irq does not seem to fix this problem
> though.

Hi Eric,

This error has been seen before in non-rt kernels.  I haven't had the
chance to track it down and kill it yet.  I believe there are locking
issues associated with it.

g.

>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________=
________________
>
> This e-mail and the information, including any attachments, it contains a=
re intended to be a confidential communication only to the person or entity=
 to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged. If=
 the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby n=
otified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communicati=
on is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error=
, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>



--=20
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-19 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-18 17:36 mpc5200 fec error Eric Millbrandt
2009-05-19 20:36 ` Robert Schwebel
2009-05-19 20:57   ` Wolfram Sang
2009-05-19 22:21     ` Eric Millbrandt
2009-05-19 23:36       ` Grant Likely [this message]
2009-05-20  6:42         ` Wolfram Sang
2009-05-20 13:42           ` Eric Millbrandt
2009-05-20 15:14             ` Jon Smirl
2009-05-20 15:28               ` Eric Millbrandt
2009-05-20 15:29                 ` Jon Smirl
2009-05-20 16:41                   ` Eric Millbrandt
2009-05-20 16:49                     ` Grant Likely
2009-05-20 17:26                       ` Eric Millbrandt
2009-05-20 17:41                         ` Grant Likely
2009-05-20 17:57                       ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fa686aa40905191636u6f4a23d0xc8c6c13904a65b8e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=emillbrandt@dekaresearch.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).