From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-gx0-f220.google.com (mail-gx0-f220.google.com [209.85.217.220]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE8BDE0C9 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 04:19:59 +1000 (EST) Received: by gxk20 with SMTP id 20so1179421gxk.9 for ; Sun, 24 May 2009 11:19:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090524180023.GA4525@sirena.org.uk> References: <20090523231148.17919.46103.stgit@terra> <20090523231303.17919.35877.stgit@terra> <20090524180023.GA4525@sirena.org.uk> From: Grant Likely Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:19:37 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/9] Add a few more mpc5200 PSC defines To: Mark Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 08:13:19AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Jon Smirl wrote: >> > Add a few more mpc5200 PSC defines. More bit fields defines for mpc5200 PSC registers. This patch is going in via Grant's tree. > >> > Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl > >> Acked-by: Grant Likely > > Jon's commit log says this is going in via your tree - is that the case > or should I apply it to ASoC? Nothing else needs it in MPC5200 land and I haven't applied it to my tree yet. Go ahead and add it to the ASoC tree. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.