From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yx0-f178.google.com (mail-yx0-f178.google.com [209.85.210.178]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341D2B7C1B for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:37:49 +1100 (EST) Received: by yxe8 with SMTP id 8so5326130yxe.17 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:37:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca In-Reply-To: <20091102142232.GD4696@pengutronix.de> References: <1256894234-11264-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <1256939657.6372.81.camel@pasglop> <20091031130131.GA23009@pengutronix.de> <1257022082.7907.7.camel@pasglop> <20091102142232.GD4696@pengutronix.de> From: Grant Likely Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:37:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mpc512x/clock: fix clk_get logic To: Wolfram Sang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Wolfgang Denk , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> Sure I don't have major objections against your patch (though who is >> formally mpc512x maintainer to ack it ?), > > Grant is maintainer for MPC5xxx. Is this patch intended for mainline? I've received so many 5121 patches that only apply against a Denx tree that I'm starting to ignore them. Until the bulk of the out-of-tree 5121 support is merged, it would be helpful to specifically mention in the patch description whether or not it should be merged upstream. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.