From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f199.google.com (mail-yw0-f199.google.com [209.85.211.199]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F31B7BCA for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:22:24 +1100 (EST) Received: by ywh37 with SMTP id 37so2795801ywh.17 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:22:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca In-Reply-To: <20091112214425.GD13350@pengutronix.de> References: <18304285.1257929369240.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail19.ha2.local> <20091112214425.GD13350@pengutronix.de> From: Grant Likely Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:21:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mpc5200/gpt: tiny fix for gpt period limitation To: Wolfram Sang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Albrecht_Dre=DF?= , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote= : >> up patch 3. =A0BUT, you're on my shit list. =A0Patch 2 in your series > > Huh, are you in a bad mood today? IMHO he addressed some valid issues; an= d we > all had to start somewhere regarding the workflow. I know that manually > adapting patches is annoying, but this wording sounds quite strong... Albrecht has been around for a bit now. He does good work, responds to comments, and in general shows good taste. This particular case was just a bit sloppy. The patch was damaged on the mailing list and it conflicted with his other patches. I know he knows better. Albrecht, I'm not actually mad at you, and I'm sorry for the harsh working. The patch series is good work. I wouldn't have picked it up if it was otherwise. I'm just a little annoyed about something I know you can handle better. I don't bear any ill will. Cheers, g. --=20 Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.