From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yx0-f179.google.com (mail-yx0-f179.google.com [209.85.210.179]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FEFB6F19 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:32:26 +1100 (EST) Received: by yxe9 with SMTP id 9so5043415yxe.26 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:32:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca In-Reply-To: <20091121212047.GA29715@yookeroo> References: <5eb65910911211046q433072f1nd2a6eb955593a37a@mail.gmail.com> <20091121212047.GA29715@yookeroo> From: Grant Likely Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:32:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DTS for PowerPC 440 based board To: David Gibson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Vinayak Kale List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 2:20 PM, David Gibson wrote: > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:16:59AM +0530, Vinayak Kale wrote: >> 2) If uboot passes BDInfo struct to kernel instead of DT blob, then in t= his >> case does kernel creates FDT at run time? > > Not exactly. =A0In this case the bootwrapper will be built with an FDT > (compiled from a dts) built in. =A0It will however tweak the FDT with > information from the BDInfo before booting the kernel proper. ...but if you have any sort of choice, save yourself some trouble and enable FDT support in u-boot. Then you don't need to muck about with problematic bd_info structures. g. --=20 Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.