From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca In-Reply-To: <20091210.135609.124000757.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20091209.161550.168794100.davem@davemloft.net> <20091209.162121.256573183.davem@davemloft.net> <20091210.135609.124000757.davem@davemloft.net> From: Grant Likely Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:03:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Deprecating of_platform, the path from here... To: David Miller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, jk@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:56 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Grant Likely > Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:47:33 -0700 > >> Trying to go the other way around (deprecate platform and encouraging >> of_platform instead) I don't think will gain much traction; whereas I >> think bringing of_platform features into platform will be an easier >> sell. =A0I'm trying to be pragmatic here. > > When people use words like "traction" and "pragmatic" that means they > are making decisions for reasons other than technical ones. :-) 100% true. :-) g. --=20 Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.