linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Cc: Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding for QE firmware
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:26:06 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa686aa41003251826m16ea94dfy422fae14fec81204@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BAB9120.1060600@freescale.com>

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com> wrote:
> Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com> wrote=
:
>>> It seems to me that there are plausible use cases for both direct-inclu=
sion
>>> and indirection. =A0I don't see any real problems with either, so I wou=
ld vote
>>> for specifying both alternatives.
>>
>> Ugh. =A0Then this one driver would need to implement both binding for
>> little, if any, actual benefit.
>
> Although I agree that I don't like supporting both bindings, we could enc=
apsulate the locating of the firmware node in a function. =A0The function w=
ill first look for a child firmware node, and if it doesn't find it, look f=
or a fsl,firmware property. =A0It will return a pointer to the firmware nod=
e regardless.

Wait... After eating dinner and mulling on it a bit, I think I've
changed my mind.  I have no objections left if you do it the way Mitch
suggests with one minor change:

diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/cpm_qe/qe.txt
b/Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/cpm_qe/qe.txt
index 6e37be1..d9d6431 100644
--- a/Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/cpm_qe/qe.txt
+++ b/Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/cpm_qe/qe.txt
 - fsl,qe-num-riscs: define how many RISC engines the QE has.
 - fsl,qe-num-snums: define how many serial number(SNUM) the QE can use for=
 the
  threads.
+- fsl,firmware:
+    Usage: Optional.
+    Value type: <prop-encoded-array>, encoded array of bytes
+    Definition: Contains the QUICC engine firmware blob.
[plus any other properties needed for firmware metadata]
+- fsl,firmware-phandle:
+    Usage: Required if fsl,firmware property is not present.
+    Value type: <phandle>
+    Definition: Points to another fsl,qe node that has the
fsl,firmware property.

 Recommended properties
 - brg-frequency : the internal clock source frequency for baud-rate

[...]

+Example:
+       qe1: qe@e0080000 {
+               compatible =3D "fsl,qe";
+               fsl,firmware =3D /bininc/("firmware-blob.bin");  /* Or
squirted in by firmware */
+               ...
+       }
+
+       qe@e0090000 {
+               compatible =3D "fsl,qe";
+               fsl,firmware-phandle =3D <&qe1>;
+               ...
+       }

Putting the blob into just one of the qe nodes keeps everything nicely
contained with the device it actually applies to.  No debates about
the best place to put device firmware blobs or new compatible values,
and it is applicable to any device where firmware needs to be passed
via the tree.

g.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-26  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-23 21:42 [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding for QE firmware Timur Tabi
2010-03-24  6:07 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-24 12:05   ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-24 17:00     ` Segher Boessenkool
2010-03-24 17:07       ` Grant Likely
2010-03-24 17:31         ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-24 18:10           ` Grant Likely
2010-03-24 18:21             ` Mitch Bradley
2010-03-24 18:25             ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-24 18:24           ` M. Warner Losh
2010-03-24 18:31             ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-25  1:49           ` Segher Boessenkool
2010-03-25 14:42             ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-25 16:10               ` Grant Likely
2010-03-25 16:34                 ` Scott Wood
2010-03-25 16:46                   ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-26 18:23                     ` Rafal Jaworowski
2010-03-25 23:53               ` M. Warner Losh
2010-03-26  0:22                 ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-25 15:16             ` Scott Wood
2010-03-25 15:29               ` Mitch Bradley
2010-03-25 16:16                 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-25 16:36                   ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-25 16:50                     ` Scott Wood
2010-03-25 16:59                     ` Grant Likely
2010-03-25 17:03                       ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-25 17:35                         ` Grant Likely
2010-03-25 18:05                           ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-25 19:53                           ` Scott Wood
2010-03-25 20:04                             ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-25 21:54                               ` Grant Likely
2010-03-25 22:19                                 ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-25 21:39                             ` Grant Likely
2010-03-25 22:47                               ` Scott Wood
2010-03-25 21:22                       ` David Gibson
2010-03-26  1:26                     ` Grant Likely [this message]
2010-03-26 15:17                       ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-26 18:20                         ` Grant Likely
2010-03-26 18:39                           ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-26 18:44                             ` Grant Likely
2010-03-26 18:48                               ` Timur Tabi
2010-03-26 18:56                                 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-26 18:58                                 ` Mitch Bradley
2010-03-26 19:07                                   ` Grant Likely
2010-03-26 18:48                             ` Mitch Bradley
2010-03-24 18:27         ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fa686aa41003251826m16ea94dfy422fae14fec81204@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=timur@freescale.com \
    --cc=wmb@firmworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).