linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	paulus@samba.org, npiggin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/pseries/mm: call H_BLOCK_REMOVE
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 11:41:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb69ba85-eaee-d582-3254-26bb5da4828d@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877elcj0oa.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>

On 30/07/2018 15:47, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
> 
> Just one comment below.
> 
> Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
>> index 96b8cd8a802d..41ed03245eb4 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
>> @@ -418,6 +418,73 @@ static void pSeries_lpar_hpte_invalidate(unsigned long slot, unsigned long vpn,
>>  	BUG_ON(lpar_rc != H_SUCCESS);
>>  }
>>  
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * As defined in the PAPR's section 14.5.4.1.8
>> + * The control mask doesn't include the returned reference and change bit from
>> + * the processed PTE.
>> + */
>> +#define HBLKR_AVPN		0x0100000000000000UL
>> +#define HBLKR_CTRL_MASK		0xf800000000000000UL
>> +#define HBLKR_CTRL_SUCCESS	0x8000000000000000UL
>> +#define HBLKR_CTRL_ERRNOTFOUND	0x8800000000000000UL
>> +#define HBLKR_CTRL_ERRBUSY	0xa000000000000000UL
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * H_BLOCK_REMOVE caller.
>> + * @idx should point to the latest @param entry set with a PTEX.
>> + * If PTE cannot be processed because another CPUs has already locked that
>> + * group, those entries are put back in @param starting at index 1.
>> + * If entries has to be retried and @retry_busy is set to true, these entries
>> + * are retried until success. If @retry_busy is set to false, the returned
>> + * is the number of entries yet to process.
>> + */
>> +static unsigned long call_block_remove(unsigned long idx, unsigned long *param,
>> +				       bool retry_busy)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long i, rc, new_idx;
>> +	unsigned long retbuf[PLPAR_HCALL9_BUFSIZE];
>> +
>> +again:
>> +	new_idx = 0;
>> +	BUG_ON((idx < 2) || (idx > PLPAR_HCALL9_BUFSIZE));
> 
> I count 1 ..
> 
>> +	if (idx < PLPAR_HCALL9_BUFSIZE)
>> +		param[idx] = HBR_END;
>> +
>> +	rc = plpar_hcall9(H_BLOCK_REMOVE, retbuf,
>> +			  param[0], /* AVA */
>> +			  param[1],  param[2],  param[3],  param[4], /* TS0-7 */
>> +			  param[5],  param[6],  param[7],  param[8]);
>> +	if (rc == H_SUCCESS)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	BUG_ON(rc != H_PARTIAL);
> 
> 2 ...
> 
>> +	/* Check that the unprocessed entries were 'not found' or 'busy' */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < idx-1; i++) {
>> +		unsigned long ctrl = retbuf[i] & HBLKR_CTRL_MASK;
>> +
>> +		if (ctrl == HBLKR_CTRL_ERRBUSY) {
>> +			param[++new_idx] = param[i+1];
>> +			continue;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		BUG_ON(ctrl != HBLKR_CTRL_SUCCESS
>> +		       && ctrl != HBLKR_CTRL_ERRNOTFOUND);
> 
> 3 ...
> 
> BUG_ON()s.
> 
> I know the code in this file is already pretty liberal with the use of
> BUG_ON() but I'd prefer if we don't make it any worse.

The first one is clearly not required. But I would keep the following twos
because this call is not expected to fail except if there is a discrepancy
between the linux kernel HASH views and the hypervisor's one, which could be
dramatic in the consequences.

> 
> Given this is an optimisation it seems like we should be able to fall
> back to the existing implementation in the case of error (which will
> probably then BUG_ON() 😂)

I don't think falling back to the H_BULK call will be helpfull since it is
doing the same so the same errors are expected. Furthermore, this hcall can do
a partial work which means complex code to fallback on H_BULK as we should
identify to already processed entries.

> If there's some reason we can't then I guess I can live with it.

I'm proposing to send a new series with _only_ 2 calls to BUG_ON().

Furthermore this patch is not correct on the way the huge pages are managed. I
was too hurry to push it last time.

Cheers,
Laurent.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-16  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-27 13:51 [resend] [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/pseries: use H_BLOCK_REMOVE Laurent Dufour
2018-07-27 13:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/pseries/mm: Introducing FW_FEATURE_BLOCK_REMOVE Laurent Dufour
2018-07-30 14:18   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-07-27 13:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/pseries/mm: factorize PTE slot computation Laurent Dufour
2018-07-30 14:19   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-07-27 13:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/pseries/mm: call H_BLOCK_REMOVE Laurent Dufour
2018-07-30 13:47   ` Michael Ellerman
2018-07-30 14:22     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-08-16 17:27       ` Laurent Dufour
2018-08-16  9:41     ` Laurent Dufour [this message]
2018-08-01  1:55 ` [resend] [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/pseries: use H_BLOCK_REMOVE Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-03  2:29   ` Michael Ellerman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-07-27 13:22 Laurent Dufour
2018-07-27 13:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/pseries/mm: call H_BLOCK_REMOVE Laurent Dufour

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fb69ba85-eaee-d582-3254-26bb5da4828d@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).