From: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: oleg@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
jniethe5@gmail.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] powerpc/uprobes: Validation for prefixed instruction
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:03:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcbf618d-453e-b6ab-a41f-f69157ec1504@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210305115433.140769-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
On 05/03/21 5:24 pm, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> As per ISA 3.1, prefixed instruction should not cross 64-byte
> boundary. So don't allow Uprobe on such prefixed instruction.
>
> There are two ways probed instruction is changed in mapped pages.
> First, when Uprobe is activated, it searches for all the relevant
> pages and replace instruction in them. In this case, if that probe
> is on the 64-byte unaligned prefixed instruction, error out
> directly. Second, when Uprobe is already active and user maps a
> relevant page via mmap(), instruction is replaced via mmap() code
> path. But because Uprobe is invalid, entire mmap() operation can
> not be stopped. In this case just print an error and continue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210304050529.59391-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com
> v3->v4:
> - CONFIG_PPC64 check was not required, remove it.
> - Use SZ_ macros instead of hardcoded numbers.
>
Acked-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-08 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-05 11:54 [PATCH v4] powerpc/uprobes: Validation for prefixed instruction Ravi Bangoria
2021-03-08 4:33 ` Sandipan Das [this message]
2021-03-09 9:54 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-03-09 11:21 ` Naveen N. Rao
2021-03-09 12:58 ` Ravi Bangoria
2021-03-10 5:13 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fcbf618d-453e-b6ab-a41f-f69157ec1504@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sandipan@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).