From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E4E1C433F5 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 01:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KMvQD2G75z3bP0 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:43:16 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=KOTzp/yp; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org (client-ip=2001:8b0:10b:1236::1; helo=casper.infradead.org; envelope-from=rdunlap@infradead.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=KOTzp/yp; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KMvPQ0SyBz2xF8 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:42:33 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=nVKhBCI4fMEjs9snfx8gEi1XWAYrextgE1D2YFOqA+E=; b=KOTzp/ypUL84dSmnhYdBK64S3e cjIoXkT4/g9vCeDQ1hpbdVsWfS0il7vI5bQ30uMNd/GFbaMpcNWHgC3ktL3luZ3qBChTbP/DG+zZk hGR6Y5f7gZv2YxUCHy5X1oWwNrRtcDELBA1erJfr8Qqb75te3FBRcD8d/g5jupI2wrjvVKnhwtkG+ YwvPfwzYmMVD2T0JOtB99sv+7tKCcWfjfodnRtBqAoXgxtEhBxJat9hNXhAP90vMva4qmjHTmpoKB Fk0X6NMFFvRJSjiweo47aZywVhCyTolZrQxtbsVQlNdwalbJHp5BU1KGAtW13hK4F5P68m4bSHpDW 84hhJD6w==; Received: from [2601:1c0:6280:3f0::aa0b] by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nWTX4-00B9cV-TB; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 01:41:59 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 18:41:49 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Docs: admin/kernel-parameters: edit a few boot options Content-Language: en-US To: Michael Ellerman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220321012216.23724-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> <87ils6hl1z.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> From: Randy Dunlap In-Reply-To: <87ils6hl1z.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Paul Mackerras , Pavel Machek , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Gordeev , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Christian Borntraeger , Len Brown , Vasily Gorbik , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Steven Rostedt , Sven Schnelle , Johannes Weiner , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 3/21/22 17:45, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Randy Dunlap writes: >> Clean up some of admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt: >> >> a. "smt" should be "smt=" (S390) >> b. add "smt-enabled" for POWERPC > > I'd rather you didn't. It's not well tested and we ignore it entirely on > some platforms because it causes bugs. Eventually I'd like to remove it. > > If we ever get time we'd want to support the generic `nosmt` argument > instead. No problem. Thanks for replying. -- ~Randy