linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 'Milton Miller' <miltonm@bga.com>
To: Dave Carroll <dcarroll@astekcorp.com>
Cc: LPPC <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: Force page alignment for initrd reserved memory
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: Force page alignment for initrd reserved memory
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 16:17:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <initrd-reserve-reply2@mdm.bga.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <522F24EF533FC546962ECFA2054FF777373072AB73@MAILSERVER2.cos.astekcorp.com>

On Sat, 21 May 2011 about 11:05:27 -0600, Dave Carroll wrote:
> 
> When using 64K pages with a separate cpio rootfs, U-Boot will align
> the rootfs on a 4K page boundary. When the memory is reserved, and
> subsequent early memblock_alloc is called, it will allocate memory
> between the 64K page alignment and reserved memory. When the reserved
> memory is subsequently freed, it is done so by pages, causing the
> early memblock_alloc requests to be re-used, which in my case, caused
> the device-tree to be clobbered.
> 
> This patch forces the reserved memory for initrd to be kernel page
> aligned, and adds the same range extension when freeing initrd.

Getting better, but

> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Carroll <dcarroll@astekcorp.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c |    4 +++-
>  arch/powerpc/mm/init_32.c  |    3 +++
>  arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c  |    3 +++
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> index 48aeb55..397d4a0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> @@ -555,7 +555,9 @@ static void __init early_reserve_mem(void)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
>         /* then reserve the initrd, if any */
>         if (initrd_start && (initrd_end > initrd_start))

Here you test the unaligned values

>  void free_initrd_mem(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>  {
> +       start = _ALIGN_DOWN(start, PAGE_SIZE);
> +       end = _ALIGN_UP(end, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
>         if (start < end)
>                 printk ("Freeing initrd memory: %ldk freed\n", (end - start) >> 10);

But here you test the aligned values.  And they are aligned with
opposite bias.  Which means that if start == end (or is less than,
but within the same page), a page that wasn't reserved (same
32 and 64 bit) gets freed.

I thought "what happens if we are within a page of end, could we
free the last page of bss?", but then I checked vmlinux.lds and we
align end to page size.  I thought other allocations should be safe,
but then remembered: 

The flattened device tree (of which we continue to use the string
table after boot) could be a problem.

milton

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-22 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20 21:26 [PATCH]powerpc: Force page alignment for early reserved memory Dave Carroll
2011-05-20 22:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-20 23:23   ` [PATCH v2]powerpc: Force page alignment for initrd Dave Carroll
2011-05-21 10:36     ` [v2] powerpc: " Milton Miller
2011-05-21 17:05       ` [PATCH v3] powerpc: Force page alignment for initrd reserved memory Dave Carroll
2011-05-22 21:17         ` 'Milton Miller' [this message]
2011-05-23  1:29           ` Dave Carroll
2011-05-23  2:31           ` [PATCH v4] " Dave Carroll
2011-05-23 16:50             ` [ " Dave Carroll
2011-05-23 17:39               ` Milton Miller
2011-05-23 22:54                 ` [PATCH v5] " Dave Carroll
2011-05-25  9:28                   ` [v5] " Milton Miller
2011-05-26  2:00                     ` [PATCH v6] " Dave Carroll
2011-05-26  2:32                     ` [PATCH v7] " Dave Carroll
2011-05-26 11:18                       ` Milton Miller
2011-05-26 16:53                         ` [PATCH v8] " Dave Carroll
2011-06-11  1:38                     ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: Move free_initmem to common code Dave Carroll
2011-06-11  1:38                       ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: Add printk companion for ppc_md.progress Dave Carroll

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=initrd-reserve-reply2@mdm.bga.com \
    --to=miltonm@bga.com \
    --cc=dcarroll@astekcorp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).