linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	linuxppc64-dev <linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix PowerMac sound i2c
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 11:37:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jefynz0zvr.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1136695956.30123.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> (Benjamin Herrenschmidt's message of "Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:52:36 +1100")

Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> writes:

> My patch reworking the PowerMac i2c code break the sound drivers as they
> used to rely on some broken behaviour of i2c-keywest that is gone now.

I'm not sure, but from looking at the other i2c drivers I'd rather think
that the old behaviour of i2c-keywest was correct.  There are only a few
that implement both I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA and I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA, but
none of them write the length byte together with the data.  The commands
are ony different in behaviour when reading: with I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA
a fixed sized block is read from the bus, whereas with
I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA the size of the block is variable.  At least that's
how i2c-nforce2, i2c-viapro and i2c-amd8111 implement the commands.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-01-08 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-08  4:52 [PATCH] powerpc: Fix PowerMac sound i2c Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-01-08  4:55 ` Hollis Blanchard
2006-01-08  6:22   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-01-08 23:37     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-01-08 10:37 ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2006-01-08 13:30   ` Andreas Schwab
2006-01-08 21:03   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-02-04 18:26 ` Paul Collins
2006-02-04 22:56   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jefynz0zvr.fsf@sykes.suse.de \
    --to=schwab@suse.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).