From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.suse.de (ns.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.suse.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8070679E6 for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:46:18 +1000 (EST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: sign extension for 32bit syscalls on ppc64 References: <20060428131254.GA507@lst.de> <17490.42497.351114.712494@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20060429113059.150cadd6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <17490.53377.898206.21369@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20060429131640.6f79e0d3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:46:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20060429131640.6f79e0d3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:16:40 +1000") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Stephen Rothwell writes: > Has any testing been done on these interfaces that involves 32 bit > processes passing AT_FDCWD on 64 bit kernels (I realise that it will work > for some architectures but I suspect not ppc64). Appears to work fine for me (tested with openat). Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."