From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from electricrain.com (electricrain.com [207.7.145.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216E467BA5 for ; Sat, 22 Jul 2006 04:46:15 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:46:12 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Brian D. Carlstrom" To: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) Subject: Re: AltiVec in the kernel In-Reply-To: <20060721165130.GS5905@austin.ibm.com> References: <000001c6acd3$ea93f5c0$99dfdfdf@bakuhatsu.net> <20060721165130.GS5905@austin.ibm.com> Cc: 'Olof Johansson' , 'Paul Mackerras' , 'linuxppc-dev list' Reply-To: "Brian D. Carlstrom" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , At Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:51:30 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote: > If you've got good code, you'll just need to be persistent. While I agree with most of Matt's rant, I think Linas is right as well. Hearing that code is already in a distribution like Gentoo makes it easier to make the case that the code doesn't suck or is vaporware. -bri disclaimer: a PhD student working outside my specialty :)