From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5B7B7DA9 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 01:40:13 +1000 (EST) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OE2Bj-0006Oi-Or for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 17:25:03 +0200 Received: from adsl-ull-134-189.46-151.net24.it ([151.46.189.134]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 17:25:03 +0200 Received: from ppc.addon by adsl-ull-134-189.46-151.net24.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 17:25:03 +0200 To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org From: nello martuscielli Subject: Re: "event-scan failed" logflood Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 12:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20100513111603.3352.qmail@kosh.dhis.org> <1273786104.21352.190.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Benjamin Herrenschmidt kernel.crashing.org> writes: _omissis__ > > Ok, that gives us a good thing to use to not do the scanning then. If > that's 0 then we assume it's a bogus OF and we disable the scan > completely. I'll do a patch later today, though feel free to beat me to > it. > > Cheers, > Ben. > hi, is there available that patch? With the fresh new 2.6.34 the logflood problem is still present. thanks, --nello