From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com (ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com [166.70.28.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55752DE0B4 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:37:30 +1100 (EST) From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: michael@ellerman.id.au Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/16] Ops based MSI Implementation References: <1169714047.65693.647693675533.qpush@cradle> <1169876504.2294.23.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1169971963.19887.15.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 01:36:52 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1169971963.19887.15.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> (Michael Ellerman's message of "Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:12:43 +1100") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kyle McMartin , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Brice Goglin , shaohua.li@intel.com, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, "David S. Miller" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Michael Ellerman writes: > We should probably just stop talking until I've got that series worked > out and posted, and then you can tell me what you think of it :) Sounds like a plan. A series that kills the worst of the current code as far as multiple architecture stuff, which should make your series prettier. I just finished testing and I'm heading for bed now. When I'm alert enough to rebase my changes onto Greg's tree instead of linus-current. I'll submit it. I don't think there are going to be any conflicts with your first 4 patches that Greg sucked up but I figure it is best to check. Anyway for architecture hooks I have it down to just: /* * The arch hook for setup up msi irqs */ int arch_setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *desc); void arch_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq); Which should be good enough to handle everything but RTAS. Eric