From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
To: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: ppc64 sbrk returns executable heap in 32-bit emulation mode
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 10:49:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m21t52xu92.fsf@linux-m68k.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160516062425.GA24091__32035.8907142237$1463379977$gmane$org@bubble.grove.modra.org> (Alan Modra's message of "Mon, 16 May 2016 15:54:25 +0930")
Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:41:09PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> We noticed that on ppc64, the sbrk system call in the 32-bit subsystem
>> returns executable memory. I assume it is related to this, in
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h:
>>
>> /*
>> * Unfortunately the PLT is in the BSS in the PPC32 ELF ABI,
>> * and needs to be executable. This means the whole heap ends
>> * up being executable.
>> */
>> #define VM_DATA_DEFAULT_FLAGS32 (VM_READ | VM_WRITE | VM_EXEC | \
>> VM_MAYREAD | VM_MAYWRITE | VM_MAYEXEC)
>>
>>
>> What is the rationale for this? This comment must be *really* old,
>
> I think the comment is just plain wrong. ppc32 needs an executable
> stack because it builds trampolines on the stack to support calling
> nested functions. I presume that's why the heap is executable.
The stack and the heap are separate mappings.
> (If
> I'm wrong about heap+stack needing the same protection then I can't
> think of any reason to require an executable heap.)
The heap and the BSS initially share the same page.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-16 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-12 13:41 ppc64 sbrk returns executable heap in 32-bit emulation mode Florian Weimer
2016-05-16 6:24 ` Alan Modra
2016-05-16 8:51 ` Florian Weimer
[not found] ` <20160516062425.GA24091__32035.8907142237$1463379977$gmane$org@bubble.grove.modra.org>
2016-05-16 8:49 ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2016-05-16 8:59 ` Florian Weimer
2016-05-16 9:09 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-05-16 16:27 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m21t52xu92.fsf@linux-m68k.org \
--to=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=amodra@gmail.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).