From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9947CB6F72 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:07:24 +1000 (EST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Larry Finger Subject: Re: [PATCH] ssb: pci: implement serdes workaround References: <1301657212-12126-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <4DE505C6.8020601@lwfinger.net> <4DE51487.1000808@lwfinger.net> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 19:07:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4DE51487.1000808@lwfinger.net> (Larry Finger's message of "Tue, 31 May 2011 11:17:11 -0500") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Rafa=C5=82_Mi=C5=82ecki?= , Michael =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=BCsch?= , public-b43-dev-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@plane.gmane.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "John W. Linville" , public-linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@plane.gmane.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Larry Finger writes: > On 05/31/2011 10:54 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Larry Finger writes: >> >>> From the traceback, it must be the serdes_pll_device read that failed. >> >> Why not ssb_pcicore_polarity_workaround (note r4 == 0x134)? > > Mainly because the last two steps in the traceback are > > [c2ca5c40] [f2146244] ssb_pcie_read+0x4c/0x54 [ssb] > [c2ca5c50] [f2146440] ssb_pcicore_serdes_workaround+0x1c/0x170 [ssb] Which exactly is what ssb_pcicore_polarity_workaround is doing. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."