From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 215242C0099 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:05:05 +1000 (EST) From: Andreas Schwab To: John Stultz Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] time: Condense timekeeper.xtime into xtime_sec References: <1342156917-25092-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> <1342156917-25092-5-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> <503288ED.10306@linaro.org> <503296C1.4070906@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 22:04:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <503296C1.4070906@linaro.org> (John Stultz's message of "Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:57:53 -0700") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Prarit Bhargava , Peter Zijlstra , Richard Cochran , Linux Kernel , Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , John Stultz writes: > Huh. Yea, that looks fine. And without the > __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime() call, the system resumed ok? Yes, it does. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."