From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DAD100904 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:07:52 +1100 (EST) From: Andreas Schwab To: prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: ppc_set_hwdebug vs ptrace_set_debugreg References: <20101129072233.GA15560@in.ibm.com> <20101201043758.GA2219@in.ibm.com> <20101213082619.GA6582@in.ibm.com> <20101214125427.GA2443@in.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:07:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20101214125427.GA2443@in.ibm.com> (K. Prasad's message of "Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:24:27 +0530") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Dave Kleikamp , Srikar Dronamraju , Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , "K.Prasad" writes: > How about the revised patch below? It is only compile-tested; have you > got a quick test case that I can run? It crashes the kernel when running the watch-vfork test. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."